Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3930K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3930K

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 60% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark score 12,084 vs 965 More than 12.5x better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,949 vs 689 More than 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
More cores 6 vs 1 5 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 12 vs 1 11 more threads
Front view of Intel Core Solo T1500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core Solo T1500

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.33 MB/core More than 6x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3930K vs Solo T1500

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3930K  vs
Solo T1500 
Clock speed 3.2 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Hexa core Single core
Socket type
LGA 2011
M
479

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Core i7 3930K  vs
Solo T1500 
Threads 12 1
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 172.6W N/A
Intel Core i7 3930K
Report a correction
Intel Core Solo T1500
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus