CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3820 vs 4670K

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Passmark (Overclocked), Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Winner
Intel Core i5 4670K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 4670K  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i5 4670K

Intel Core i5 4670K

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3820

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3820

Report a correction
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Significantly more l3 cache 10 MB vs 6 MB More than 65% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more RAM 65,536 MB vs 32,768 MB Supports 2x more RAM
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Much more l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core More than 65% more l3 cache per core
Better 3DMark11 physics score 10,460 vs 6,830 Around 55% better 3DMark11 physics score
Better PassMark score 9,029 vs 7,686 More than 15% better PassMark score
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.83 GHz vs 4.59 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core i5 4670K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4670K

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 32 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 68.25W vs 139.6W 2x lower typical power consumption
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,213 vs 1,941 Around 15% better PassMark (Single core) score
Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 72.72 °C vs 66.8 °C Around 10% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score 7,335 vs 5,006 More than 45% better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score
Better performance per watt 12.3 pt/W vs 6.4 pt/W More than 90% better performance per watt
Better performance per dollar 6.45 pt/$ vs 4.23 pt/$ Around 55% better performance per dollar
Much lower annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year vs 49.49 $/year 2.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year vs 138.93 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Marginally newer Apr, 2013 vs Feb, 2012 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3820 vs i5 4670K

GeekBench (32-bit)

Core i7 3820
12,556
Core i5 4670K
11,560

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Core i7 3820 Core i5 4670K @ community.futuremark.com

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Core i7 3820
23,387
Core i5 4670K
25,519
Core i7 3820 Core i5 4670K @ anandtech.com

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

Core i7 3820 Core i5 4670K @ anandtech.com

Passmark (Single Core)

Reviews Word on the street

Core i7 3820  vs i5 4670K 

8.0
8.0
Predictably things are pretty close in terms of raw performance.
Core i7 3820

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3820  vs
i5 4670K 
Clock speed 3.6 GHz 3.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes Yes
Is hyperthreaded Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
FMA3
SSE2
EM64T
F16C
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
AVX 2.0
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,200 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 51,200 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 32,768 MB

details

Core i7 3820  vs
i5 4670K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 10 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms 22 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 66.8°C Unknown - 72.72°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 142 57
Overclocked clock speed 4.72 GHz 4.51 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.83 GHz 4.59 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 5,531.8 5,198.5
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.72 GHz 4.51 GHz

power consumption

TDP 130W 84W
Annual home energy cost 49.49 $/year 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 138.93 $/year 73.58 $/year
Performance per watt 6.4 pt/W 12.3 pt/W
Typical power consumption 139.6W 68.25W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 0
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Core i7 3820
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 4670K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus