CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Core i7 3770K vs Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Cinebench R11.5, Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Cinebench R11.5 (1-core), Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and 1 more

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Passmark (Overclocked), Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Winner
Intel Core i7 3770K

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3770K based on its performance, single-core performance, overclocking and value.

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770K

Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 6 MB Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 2,080 vs 1,277 Around 65% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better SysMark 2007 overall score 303 vs 204 Around 50% better SysMark 2007 overall score
Much better cinebench r11.5 (1-core) score 1.66 vs 1.11 Around 50% better cinebench r11.5 (1-core) score
Significantly better 3DMark11 physics score 8,240 vs 5,070 Around 65% better 3DMark11 physics score
Significantly better PassMark score 9,612 vs 5,971 More than 60% better PassMark score
Significantly better GeekBench score 18,001 vs 11,854 More than 50% better GeekBench score
Significantly better SysMark 2007 3D score 340 vs 215 Around 60% better SysMark 2007 3D score
More threads 8 vs 6 2 more threads
Significantly higher Maximum Operating Temperature 67.4 °C vs 62 °C Around 10% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Significantly better PassMark (Overclocked) score 5,860.5 vs 2,532.3 More than 2.2x better PassMark (Overclocked) score
Lower peak power consumption 128.3W vs 157.8W Around 20% lower peak power consumption
Significantly more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
Significantly better SysMark 2007 productivity score 276 vs 192 Around 45% better SysMark 2007 productivity score
Better SysMark 2007 video creation score 293 vs 239 Around 25% better SysMark 2007 video creation score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.78 GHz vs 4.09 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better cinebench r10 32Bit score 25,703 vs 18,828 More than 35% better cinebench r10 32Bit score
Better performance per watt 11.38 pt/W vs 6.15 pt/W More than 85% better performance per watt
Marginally newer Apr, 2012 vs Dec, 2010 Release date over 1 years later
Better performance per dollar 4.63 pt/$ vs 2.77 pt/$ More than 65% better performance per dollar
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.91 GHz vs 4.16 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual commercial energy cost 112.39 $/year vs 138.23 $/year Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 42.19 $/year vs 47.78 $/year More than 10% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

More l2 cache 3 MB vs 1 MB 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3770K vs Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Core i7 3770K Phenom II X6 Black 1100T @ community.futuremark.com
Since the Intel HD 4000 Graphics supports DirectX 11 you can run 3DMark 11 on the Intel Core i7-3770K processor without the need of a discrete graphics card.
Core i7 3770K | by Legit Reviews (Apr, 2012)

Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R10 - Seconds: Faster is better.
Phenom II X6 Black 1100T | by Tech Radar (Feb, 2011)

Cinebench R11.5 (Single Core)

Passmark

I ran the passmark pc test cpu bench and the highest at 5200mhz I reached was 12884.4 cpu score thats close to the I-7 six core speeds.
Core i7 3770K | by FASTER220 (Jul, 2012)

Reviews Word on the street

Core i7 3770K vs Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

8.0
8.0
And because Ivy Bridge chips like the Core i7-3770K are intended for more middle-of-the-road users, they come loaded with integrated graphics systems that can drive up to three independent displays and support HDMI 1.4a and its associated high-quality audio, in addition to InTru 3D (for stereoscopic 3D) and HD video conferencing.
Core i7 3770K

8.0
9.0
AMD has finessed the new 1100T's pricing carefully and it matches up well with the Intel Core i7 870 in multithreaded benchmarks such as video encoding and professional 3D rendering.
Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

9.4
9.6
i paid 150$ for this wile they were discontinued and that was 150$ well spent!
Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

9.5
9.7
I am using the Saber-tooth 990FX and it automatically bumped this processor up to 3.6ghz from 3.3!
Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

Overall

8.8 Out of 10
9.1 Out of 10

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3770K vs
Phenom II X6 Black 1100T
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Hexa core
Socket type
LGA 1155
AM3
Is unlocked Yes Yes
Is hyperthreaded Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

overclocking

Overclock popularity 332 280
Overclock review score 0.96 1
Overclocked clock speed 4.78 GHz 4.09 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.91 GHz 4.16 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 5,860.5 2,532.3
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.78 GHz 4.09 GHz

power consumption

TDP 77W 125W
Annual home energy cost 42.19 $/year 47.78 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 112.39 $/year 138.23 $/year
Performance per watt 11.38 pt/W 6.15 pt/W
Idle power consumption 75W 76.6W
Peak power consumption 128.3W 157.8W
Typical power consumption 114.98W N/A

details

Core i7 3770K vs
Phenom II X6 Black 1100T
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 6
L2 cache 1 MB 3 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 45 nms
Transistor count 1,400,000,000 904,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 35 16
Voltage range 1.33 - 1.36V 1 - 1.48V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67.4°C Unknown - 62°C

gpu

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 N/A
Latest DirectX 11.x N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz N/A
3DMark06 5,339.9 N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR2-1066
DDR3
DDR2
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s

bus

Architecture DMI HyperTransport 3.0
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 4,000 MT/s

Comments

comments powered by Disqus