0 Comments
Intel Core i7 3770K vs AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T
Intel Core i7 3770K
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
by Legit Reviews (May, 2012)Especially if you consider that when it comes to clock to clock performance, the Intel Core i7 3770K 'Ivy Bridge' processor is faster than the Intel Core i7 'Sandy Bridge' platform.
VS
AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T
- 3.3 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
by Legit Reviews (Dec, 2010)The Athlon II X3 455 will maintain the $87.00 msrp of the Athlon II X3 450 and you can find the AMD Athlon II pricing line up here.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Core i7 3770K vs Phenom II X6 Black 1100T
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Cinebench R11.5, Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark and GeekBench | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Cinebench R11.5 (1-core), Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and 1 more | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Passmark (Overclocked), Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| ||||||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nms | vs | 45 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core | ||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | ||
| More l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 6 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | ||
| Higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 3.3 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | ||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,080 | vs | 1,277 | Around 65% better PassMark (Single core) score | ||
| Significantly better SysMark 2007 overall score | 303 | vs | 204 | Around 50% better SysMark 2007 overall score | ||
| Much better cinebench r11.5 (1-core) score | 1.66 | vs | 1.11 | Around 50% better cinebench r11.5 (1-core) score | ||
| Significantly better 3DMark11 physics score | 8,240 | vs | 5,070 | Around 65% better 3DMark11 physics score | ||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 9,612 | vs | 5,971 | More than 60% better PassMark score | ||
| Significantly better GeekBench score | 18,001 | vs | 11,854 | More than 50% better GeekBench score | ||
| Significantly better SysMark 2007 3D score | 340 | vs | 215 | Around 60% better SysMark 2007 3D score | ||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 6 | 2 more threads | ||
| Significantly higher Maximum Operating Temperature | 67.4 °C | vs | 62 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum Operating Temperature | ||
| Significantly better PassMark (Overclocked) score | 5,860.5 | vs | 2,532.3 | More than 2.2x better PassMark (Overclocked) score | ||
| Lower peak power consumption | 128.3W | vs | 157.8W | Around 20% lower peak power consumption | ||
| Significantly more l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l3 cache per core | ||
| Significantly better SysMark 2007 productivity score | 276 | vs | 192 | Around 45% better SysMark 2007 productivity score | ||
| Better SysMark 2007 video creation score | 293 | vs | 239 | Around 25% better SysMark 2007 video creation score | ||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.78 GHz | vs | 4.09 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | ||
| Better cinebench r10 32Bit score | 25,703 | vs | 18,828 | More than 35% better cinebench r10 32Bit score | ||
| Better performance per watt | 11.38 pt/W | vs | 6.15 pt/W | More than 85% better performance per watt | ||
| Marginally newer | Apr, 2012 | vs | Dec, 2010 | Release date over 1 years later | ||
| Better performance per dollar | 4.63 pt/$ | vs | 2.77 pt/$ | More than 65% better performance per dollar | ||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.91 GHz | vs | 4.16 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | ||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 112.39 $/year | vs | 138.23 $/year | Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | ||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 42.19 $/year | vs | 47.78 $/year | More than 10% lower annual home energy cost | ||
| ||||||
| More l2 cache | 3 MB | vs | 1 MB | 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | ||
| More cores | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | ||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | ||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3770K vs Phenom II X6 Black 1100T
3D Mark 11 (Physics)
Core i7 3770K
8,240
Phenom II X6 Black 1100T
5,070
Core i7 3770K | by Legit Reviews (Apr, 2012)Since the Intel HD 4000 Graphics supports DirectX 11 you can run 3DMark 11 on the Intel Core i7-3770K processor without the need of a discrete graphics card.
Cinebench R11.5
Core i7 3770K
7.91
sysmark 2007 (overall)
Passmark
Core i7 3770K
9,612
Phenom II X6 Black 1100T
5,971
Core i7 3770K | by FASTER220 (Jul, 2012)I ran the passmark pc test cpu bench and the highest at 5200mhz I reached was 12884.4 cpu score thats close to the I-7 six core speeds.
Reviews Word on the street
| Core i7 3770K | vs | Phenom II X6 Black 1100T | ||
| 8.0 | 8.0 | Core i7 3770K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0 | 9.0 | Phenom II X6 Black 1100T | |
| 9.4 | 9.6 | Phenom II X6 Black 1100T | |
| 9.5 | 9.7 | Phenom II X6 Black 1100T | |
Overall | 8.8 Out of 10 | 9.1 Out of 10 | ||
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i7 3770K | vs | Phenom II X6 Black 1100T |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Hexa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| Is unlocked | Yes | Yes | |
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 332 | 280 | |
| Overclock review score | 0.96 | 1 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.78 GHz | 4.09 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.91 GHz | 4.16 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 5,860.5 | 2,532.3 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.78 GHz | 4.09 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 77W | 125W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 42.19 $/year | 47.78 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 112.39 $/year | 138.23 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 11.38 pt/W | 6.15 pt/W | |
| Idle power consumption | 75W | 76.6W | |
| Peak power consumption | 128.3W | 157.8W | |
| Typical power consumption | 114.98W | N/A | |
details | Core i7 3770K | vs | Phenom II X6 Black 1100T |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 6 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 3 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 45 nms | |
| Transistor count | 1,400,000,000 | 904,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 35 | 16 | |
| Voltage range | 1.33 - 1.36V | 1 - 1.48V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 67.4°C | Unknown - 62°C | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | 11.x | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | 5,339.9 | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | HyperTransport 3.0 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 4,000 MT/s | |
Buy Now
Compare
Related Comparisons
| | VS | |
| | VS | |
| | VS | |
| | VS | |
| | VS | |
| | VS | |
| | VS | |
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| | VS | |
| | VS | |
| | VS | |
| $225 | $225 | |
| | VS | |
| | VS | |
| | VS | |



