CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3770K vs 6272 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 3770K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3770K  based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i7 3770K

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i7 3770K

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770K

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz More than 65% higher clock speed
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 3 GHz 30% higher turbo clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 3,304 vs 1,255 Around 2.8x better geekbench 3 single core score
Much more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 67.4 °C vs 55 °C Around 25% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better PassMark score 9,549 vs 6,748 More than 40% better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Apr, 2012 vs Nov, 2011 Release date 5 months later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.64 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Opteron 6272

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 6272

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 16 MB vs 1 MB 16x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 16 vs 4 12 more cores; run more applications at once
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
More l3 cache 16 MB vs 8 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
More threads 16 vs 8 Twice as many threads
Lower typical power consumption 93.44W vs 114.97W Around 20% lower typical power consumption
Slightly better performance per watt 6.12 pt/W vs 4.56 pt/W Around 35% better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year vs 42.19 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year vs 112.39 $/year More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3770K vs Opteron 6272

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 3770K
13,098
Opteron 6272
26,707

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 3770K
2,620,000 MB/s
Opteron 6272
1,350,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3770K  vs
Opteron 6272 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 2.1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Quad core 16 core
Socket type
LGA 1155
G34
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES

power consumption

TDP 77W 115W
Annual home energy cost 42.19 $/year 27.7 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 112.39 $/year 100.74 $/year
Performance per watt 4.56 pt/W 6.12 pt/W
Typical power consumption 114.97W 93.44W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3

details

Core i7 3770K  vs
Opteron 6272 
Threads 8 16
L2 cache 1 MB 16 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 16 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 4
Clock multiplier 35 15
Operating temperature Unknown - 67.4°C Unknown - 55°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 332 2
Overclocked clock speed 4.7 GHz 2.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.64 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.7 GHz 2.9 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 N/A
Latest DirectX 11.x N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz N/A
3DMark06 5,339.9 N/A

bus

Architecture DMI HyperTransport 3.0
Number of links 1 4
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 6,400 MT/s
Intel Core i7 3770K
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 6272
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus