CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3770K vs 6700

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Winner
Intel Core i7 3770K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3770K  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i7 3770K

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i7 3770K

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770K

Report a correction
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 32 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Significantly better geekbench (32-bit) score 13,747 vs 5,804 More than 2.2x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Significantly better PassMark score 9,644 vs 4,706 More than 2x better PassMark score
Significantly better 3DMark11 physics score 8,170 vs 3,540 More than 2.2x better 3DMark11 physics score
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 2,090 vs 1,530 More than 35% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.9 GHz vs 4.59 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD A10 6700

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 6700

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 114.98W 2.2x lower typical power consumption
Higher clock speed 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 71.3 °C vs 67.4 °C More than 5% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 42.19 $/year 2.7x lower annual home energy cost
Better performance per dollar 3.88 pt/$ vs 3.22 pt/$ More than 20% better performance per dollar
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 112.39 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Marginally newer Jun, 2013 vs Apr, 2012 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3770K vs A10 6700

GeekBench (32-bit)

Core i7 3770K
13,747
A10 6700
5,804

GeekBench

Core i7 3770K
17,972
A10 6700
5,804

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

A10 6700
3,540
Core i7 3770K A10 6700 @ community.futuremark.com
Since the Intel HD 4000 Graphics supports DirectX 11 you can run 3DMark 11 on the Intel Core i7-3770K processor without the need of a discrete graphics card.
Core i7 3770K | by Legit Reviews (Apr, 2012)

Passmark

A10 6700
4,706
Benchmark Results: The Intel Core i7-3770K finished in third place, which is where it has finished in most of the benchmarks with a solid score of 21293 3DMarks.
Core i7 3770K | by Legit Reviews (Apr, 2012)

Passmark (Single Core)

A10 6700
1,530
Benchmark Results: The CPU benchmark results in 3DMark Vantage showed the Intel Core i7-3770K coming in third place again with a score of 26646 3DMarks.
Core i7 3770K | by Legit Reviews (Apr, 2012)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3770K  vs
A10 6700 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 3.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes No
Is hyperthreaded Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Radeon™ HD 8670D
Latest DirectX 11.x 11.0

details

Core i7 3770K  vs
A10 6700 
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 67.4°C Unknown - 71.3°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.72 GHz 4.88 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.9 GHz 4.59 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.72 GHz 4.88 GHz

power consumption

TDP 77W 65W
Annual home energy cost 42.19 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 112.39 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 8.27 pt/W 8.89 pt/W
Typical power consumption 114.98W 52.81W
Intel Core i7 3770K
Report a correction
AMD A10 6700
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus