Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Much better turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz vs 1,050 MHz Around 10% better turbo clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.03 GHz vs 2.79 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.32 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron G1620

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1620

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 44.69W vs 62.56W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year vs 67.45 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year vs 18.55 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Apr, 2012 Release date 8 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3770 vs Celeron G1620

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 3770
9.07 mHash/s
Celeron G1620
3.79 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 3770
-1 fps
Celeron G1620
0.36 fps

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 3770
2,660,000 MB/s
Celeron G1620
140,200 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3770  vs
Celeron G1620 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 77W 55W
Annual home energy cost 18.55 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 67.45 $/year 48.18 $/year
Performance per watt 7.25 pt/W 1.99 pt/W
Typical power consumption 62.56W 44.69W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i7 3770  vs
Celeron G1620 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 34 27

overclocking

Overclock popularity 8 0
Overclocked clock speed 4.03 GHz 2.79 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.32 GHz 2.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.03 GHz 2.79 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz 1,050 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Core i7 3770
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1620
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus