Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 8 MB vs None Compared to all cpus, 8 MB l3 cache is just OK
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.03 GHz vs 3.5 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.32 GHz vs 3.5 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD PRO A A6 A6 PRO-7400B

Reasons to consider the
AMD PRO A A6 A6 PRO-7400B

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz Around 5% higher clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 62.56W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C vs 67.4 °C Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 67.45 $/year More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 18.55 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3770 vs PRO A A6 A6 PRO-7400B

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 3770
9.07 mHash/s
PRO A A6 A6 PRO-7400B
46.18 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core i7 3770
3.02 mPixels/s
PRO A A6 A6 PRO-7400B
9.04 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 3770
151.63 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 3770
7.41 fps

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3770  vs
PRO A A6 A6 PRO-7400B 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES

power consumption

TDP 77W 65W
Annual home energy cost 18.55 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 67.45 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 7.25 pt/W 3.59 pt/W
Typical power consumption 62.56W 52.81W

details

Core i7 3770  vs
PRO A A6 A6 PRO-7400B 
Threads 8 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB None
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 67.4°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.03 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.32 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.03 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Radeon™ R5
Latest DirectX 11.x 12.0
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 756 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Intel Core i7 3770
Report a correction
AMD PRO A A6 A6 PRO-7400B
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus