0 Comments
| Intel Core i7 3770 vs AMD Opteron 6276 |
Released April, 2012
Intel Core i7 3770
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i7 3770
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz | ![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
VS
Released November, 2011
AMD Opteron 6276
- 2.3 GHz
- 16 core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 6276
![]() | Much more l2 cache 16 MB | ![]() | More cores 16 |
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 | ![]() | More l3 cache 16 MB |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i7 3770CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 50% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 62.56W | vs | 93.44W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,072 | vs | 1,031 | More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Significantly more l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l3 cache per core | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 67.4 °C | vs | 55 °C | Around 25% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Better performance per watt | 7.25 pt/W | vs | 6.03 pt/W | More than 20% better performance per watt | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.32 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.03 GHz | vs | 3.72 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 18.55 $/year | vs | 27.7 $/year | Around 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 67.45 $/year | vs | 100.74 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Newer | Apr, 2012 | vs | Nov, 2011 | Release date 5 months later | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 16 MB | vs | 1 MB | 16x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
More l3 cache | 16 MB | vs | 8 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
More threads | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many threads |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3770 vs Opteron 6276
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i7 3770
12,524
Opteron 6276
22,325
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i7 3770
3,236
Opteron 6276
1,264
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i7 3770
2,660,000 MB/s
Opteron 6276
1,320,000 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i7 3770
9,449
Opteron 6276
9,011
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i7 3770
2,072
Opteron 6276
1,031
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i7 3770 | vs | Opteron 6276 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | 16 core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
G34 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
power consumption | |||
TDP | 77W | 115W | |
Annual home energy cost | 18.55 $/year | 27.7 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 67.45 $/year | 100.74 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 7.25 pt/W | 6.03 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 62.56W | 93.44W | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 |
details | Core i7 3770 | vs | Opteron 6276 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 8 | 16 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 16 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 16 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 4 | |
Clock multiplier | 34 | 16 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 67.4°C | Unknown - 55°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 8 | 1 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 4.03 GHz | 3.72 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.32 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.03 GHz | 3.72 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | 11.x | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | N/A | |
3DMark06 | 5,339.9 | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | HyperTransport 3.0 | |
Number of links | 1 | 4 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s |
Intel Core i7 3770 ![]() | AMD Opteron 6276 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | $240 | |
4770 vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | $240 | |
3470 vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $240 | |
2600 vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $240 | |
3770K vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$168 | $240 | |
3570 vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$190 | $240 | |
4460 vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $240 | |
4790 vs 3770 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||