Winner
Intel Core i7 3770
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3770 based on its power consumption.
See full details | Intel Core i7 3770 vs AMD Opteron 2360 SE |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | More l3 cache 8 MB |
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
![]() | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
8.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | More than 35% higher clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
More l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 2 MB | 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Much better geekbench 3 single core score | 3,236 | vs | 1,183 | Around 2.8x better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 12,524 | vs | 8,295 | More than 50% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l3 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 62.56W | vs | 85.31W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better performance per watt | 7.25 pt/W | vs | 1.84 pt/W | Around 4x better performance per watt | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.03 GHz | vs | 2.95 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Newer | Apr, 2012 | vs | Apr, 2008 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.32 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 18.55 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 67.45 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core |
summary | Core i7 3770 | vs | Opteron 2360 SE |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
F | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 77W | 105W | |
Annual home energy cost | 18.55 $/year | 25.29 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 67.45 $/year | 91.98 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 7.25 pt/W | 1.84 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 62.56W | 85.31W |
details | Core i7 3770 | vs | Opteron 2360 SE |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 8 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 34 | 12 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.03 GHz | 2.95 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.32 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.03 GHz | 2.95 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | 11.x | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | N/A | |
3DMark06 | 5,339.9 | N/A |
Intel Core i7 3770 ![]() | AMD Opteron 2360 SE ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $280 | |
Intel Core i7 3770 vs 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $180 | |
Intel Core i7 3770 vs i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $305 | |
Intel Core i7 3770 vs 2600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $264 | |
Intel Core i7 3770 vs 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $168 | |
Intel Core i7 3770 vs i5 3570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $190 | |
Intel Core i7 3770 vs i5 4460 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $305 | |
Intel Core i7 3770 vs 4790 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||