CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3770 vs 2360 SE among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
Core i7 3770
6.2
Opteron 2360 SE
5.3
Core i5 3470
5.8
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
Core i7 3770
9.3
Opteron 2360 SE
7.8
Core i5 3470
9.1
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Core i7 3770
n.d.
Opteron 2360 SE
n.d.
Core i5 3470
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Core i7 3770
5.2
Opteron 2360 SE
0.0
Core i5 3470
5.2
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Core i7 3770
5.2
Opteron 2360 SE
5.0
Core i5 3470
5.2
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
Core i7 3770
8.2
Opteron 2360 SE
n.d.
Core i5 3470
9.9
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more
8.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets
Core i7 3770
8.3
Opteron 2360 SE
5.1
Core i5 3470
8.6

Winner
Intel Core i7 3770 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3770  based on its power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i7 3770

Front view of Intel Core i7 3770
Front view of AMD Opteron 2360 SE

AMD Opteron 2360 SE

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 2 MB 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much better geekbench 3 single core score 3,236 vs 1,183 Around 2.8x better geekbench 3 single core score
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 12,524 vs 8,295 More than 50% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Much more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l3 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 62.56W vs 85.31W More than 25% lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 7.25 pt/W vs 1.84 pt/W Around 4x better performance per watt
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.03 GHz vs 2.95 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Apr, 2012 vs Apr, 2008 Release date over 4 years later
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.32 GHz vs 2.5 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 18.55 $/year vs 25.29 $/year More than 25% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 67.45 $/year vs 91.98 $/year More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 2360 SE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2360 SE

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3770 vs Opteron 2360 SE

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 3770
12,524
Opteron 2360 SE
8,295

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 3770
3,236
Opteron 2360 SE
1,183

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 3770
2,660,000 MB/s
Opteron 2360 SE
146,600 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Core i7 3770  vs
Opteron 2360 SE 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 2.5 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1155
F
Is unlocked No No

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 77W 105W
Annual home energy cost 18.55 $/year 25.29 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 67.45 $/year 91.98 $/year
Performance per watt 7.25 pt/W 1.84 pt/W
Typical power consumption 62.56W 85.31W

details

 Core i7 3770  vs
Opteron 2360 SE 
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 2
Clock multiplier 34 12

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 4.03 GHz 2.95 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.32 GHz 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.03 GHz 2.95 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 N/A
Latest DirectX 11.x N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz N/A
3DMark06 5,339.9 N/A
Intel Core i7 3770
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2360 SE
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss