CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3667U vs 4200U among laptop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 3667U 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3667U  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3667U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3667U

Report a correction
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Front view of Intel Core i5 4200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4200U

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core i5 4200U vs the Core i7 3667U.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3667U vs i5 4200U

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 3667U
11.7 mHash/s
Core i5 4200U
11.53 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 3667U
0.62 fps
Core i5 4200U
1.18 fps

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 3667U
2,160,000 MB/s
Core i5 4200U
3,015,000 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3667U  vs
i5 4200U 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.2 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 15W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 3.61 $/year
Performance per watt 25 pt/W 38.06 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 12.19W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i7 3667U  vs
i5 4200U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.91 GHz 2.49 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.91 GHz 2.49 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label HD Graphics 4000 Intel® HD Graphics 4400
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 200 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3L-1333
DDR3RS-1600
DDR3RS-1333
LPDDR3-1333
LPDDR3-1600
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Intel Core i7 3667U
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 4200U
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus