Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3632QM

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3632QM

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 60.94W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 55 °C More than 90% higher Maximum operating temperature
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Newer Jul, 2012 vs Nov, 2008 Release date over 3 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.87 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 18.07 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 65.7 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.04 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Opteron 8378

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 8378

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Core i7 3632QM  vs Opteron 8378 

clock speed

Core i7 3632QM
2.2 GHz
Opteron 8378
2.4 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Core i7 3632QM
2.87 GHz
Opteron 8378
2.4 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Core i7 3632QM
3.04 GHz
Opteron 8378
2.4 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3632QM  vs
Opteron 8378 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
F
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 75W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 18.07 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 65.7 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 60.94W

details

Core i7 3632QM  vs
Opteron 8378 
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 8
Clock multiplier 22 12
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C 0 - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.87 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.04 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.87 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz N/A
Intel Core i7 3632QM
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 8378
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus