Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3632QM

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3632QM

Report a correction
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Front view of AMD Athlon XP-M 1700+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP-M 1700+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon XP-M 1700+ vs the Intel Core i7 3632QM.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3632QM vs Athlon XP-M 1700+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3632QM  vs
Athlon XP-M 1700+ 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 1.47 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
462
563

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Core i7 3632QM  vs
Athlon XP-M 1700+ 
Threads 8 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.87 GHz 2.11 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.04 GHz 1.47 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,790.9 86.2
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.87 GHz 2.11 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption 28.44W N/A
Intel Core i7 3632QM
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP-M 1700+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus