CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3630QM vs 6267U among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

9.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 3630QM 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3630QM  based on its performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3630QM

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3630QM

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 60.8 vs 50.1 More than 20% better 3DMark06 CPU score
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 300 MHz Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed
Better turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz vs 1,050 MHz Around 10% better turbo clock speed
Slightly more l3 cache 6 MB vs 4 MB 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly better performance per dollar 1.33 pt/$ vs 1.01 pt/$ More than 30% better performance per dollar
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better PassMark score 7,766 vs 5,017 Around 55% better PassMark score
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Core i5 6267U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 6267U

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score 20.72 fps vs 7.15 fps Around 3x better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score
Lower typical power consumption 22.75W vs 36.56W Around 40% lower typical power consumption
More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Sep, 2012 Release date over 2 years later
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 6.75 $/year vs 10.84 $/year Around 40% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 24.53 $/year vs 39.42 $/year Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3630QM vs i5 6267U

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 3630QM
6.17 mHash/s
Core i5 6267U
33.58 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core i7 3630QM
8.39 mPixels/s
Core i5 6267U
37.8 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 3630QM
138.27 fps
Core i5 6267U
374.2 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 3630QM
1.31 fps
Core i5 6267U
2.35 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 3630QM
7.15 fps
Core i5 6267U
20.72 fps

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3630QM  vs
i5 6267U 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.9 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.4 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 45W 28W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 6.75 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 24.53 $/year
Performance per watt 11.14 pt/W 10.93 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 22.75W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 4,000 MT/s

details

Core i7 3630QM  vs
i5 6267U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 4 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.16 GHz 3.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 3.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.16 GHz 3.3 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Intel® Iris™ Graphics 550
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 300 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz 1,050 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Core i7 3630QM
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 6267U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus