Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i7 3630QM

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i7 3630QM

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3630QM

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3630QM

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.06 GHz More than 2.2x higher clock speed
Much better turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz vs 500 MHz More than 2.2x better turbo clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 166 MHz Around 4x higher GPU clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per dollar 1.33 pt/$ vs 0.26 pt/$ Around 5.2x better performance per dollar
Much better performance per watt 11.14 pt/W vs 1.55 pt/W Around 7.2x better performance per watt
More l3 cache 6 MB vs 2 MB 3x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.16 GHz vs 1.07 GHz Around 3x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better PassMark score 7,766 vs 684 More than 11.2x better PassMark score
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Aug, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 1.07 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron U3405

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron U3405

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 36.56W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 10.84 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 39.42 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3630QM vs Celeron U3405

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3630QM  vs
Celeron U3405 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.06 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
BGA 1288

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 45W 18W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 11.14 pt/W 1.55 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 14.63W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 2,500 MT/s

details

Core i7 3630QM  vs
Celeron U3405 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 24 14

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.16 GHz 1.07 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 1.07 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.16 GHz 1.07 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 166 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz 500 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3L-1333
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 17,066.66 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 8,192 MB
Intel Core i7 3630QM
Report a correction
Intel Celeron U3405
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus