CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3612QM vs 3230M

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU) and Passmark

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
Intel Core i7 3612QM 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3612QM  based on its performance and features.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i7 3612QM

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i7 3612QM

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3612QM

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3612QM

Report a correction
Significantly more l3 cache 6 MB vs 3 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better PassMark score 6,853 vs 3,989 More than 70% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 5,466 vs 3,760 More than 45% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Better performance per watt 23.16 pt/W vs 15.79 pt/W More than 45% better performance per watt
Front view of Intel Core i5 3230M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3230M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Better performance per dollar 2.46 pt/$ vs 2.14 pt/$ Around 15% better performance per dollar
Marginally newer Jan, 2013 vs Apr, 2012 Release date 8 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3612QM vs i5 3230M

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Passmark

Core i7 3612QM Core i5 3230M @ cpubenchmark.net

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3612QM  vs
i5 3230M 
Clock speed 2.1 GHz 2.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.1 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 23.16 pt/W 15.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i7 3612QM  vs
i5 3230M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 22 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 21 26
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 105°C

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz 1,100 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Core i7 3612QM
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3230M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus