CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3612QE vs C2758 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 3612QE 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3612QE  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i7 3612QE

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i7 3612QE

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3612QE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3612QE

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,435 vs 513 More than 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 6,340 vs 3,162 More than 2x better PassMark score
Front view of Intel Atom C2758

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2758

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Lower typical power consumption 16.25W vs 28.44W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Apr, 2012 Release date over 1 years later
Lower annual home energy cost 4.82 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 17.52 $/year vs 30.66 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3612QE vs Atom C2758

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3612QE  vs
Atom C2758 
Clock speed 2.1 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Octa core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 35W 20W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 4.82 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 17.52 $/year
Performance per watt 4.58 pt/W 4.02 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 16.25W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i7 3612QE  vs
Atom C2758 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.1 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.1 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.1 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 N/A
Latest DirectX 10.x N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A
3DMark06 5,344.5 N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,496.64 MB 65,536 MB
Intel Core i7 3612QE
Report a correction
Intel Atom C2758
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus