Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i7 3610QM

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i7 3610QM

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3610QM

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3610QM

Report a correction
Much better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 424 MHz More than 2.5x better turbo clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz More than 25% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 327 MHz Around 2x higher GPU clock speed
Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Much better performance per watt 10.92 pt/W vs 4.7 pt/W More than 2.2x better performance per watt
Significantly better PassMark score 7,464 vs 1,576 Around 4.8x better PassMark score
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,636 vs 851 More than 90% better PassMark (Single core) score
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.11 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 100 °C 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD R R-260H

Reasons to consider the
AMD R R-260H

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 36.56W 2.6x lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 10.84 $/year 2.6x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 39.42 $/year 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 3610QM vs R R-260H

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

R R-260H
1,576

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3610QM  vs
R R-260H 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2.1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.3 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 45W 17W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 14.89 $/year
Performance per watt 10.92 pt/W 4.7 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 13.81W

details

Core i7 3610QM  vs
R R-260H 
Threads 8 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 1,400,000,000 1,303,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 23 10
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.11 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.11 GHz 2.1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 AMD Radeon HD 7500G
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 327 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz 424 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Intel Core i7 3610QM
Report a correction
AMD R R-260H
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus