Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 3517UE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3517UE

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 1.7 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Jul, 2008 Release date over 3 years later
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of Intel Celeron M 722

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 722

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 4.47W vs 13.81W 3.1x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 1.32 $/year vs 4.1 $/year 3.1x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 4.82 $/year vs 14.89 $/year 3.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Core i7 3517UE  vs Celeron M 722 

clock speed

Core i7 3517UE
1.7 GHz
Celeron M 722
1.2 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 3517UE  vs
Celeron M 722 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
BGA 1023
BGA 956

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i7 3517UE  vs
Celeron M 722 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 N/A
Latest DirectX 10.x N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A
3DMark06 5,344.5 N/A

power consumption

TDP 17W 5.5W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 1.32 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 4.82 $/year
Typical power consumption 13.81W 4.47W
Intel Core i7 3517UE
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 722
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus