CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2760QM vs 1055T among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 2760QM 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 2760QM  based on its performance, single-core performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 2760QM

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 2760QM

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 1.99 pt/$ vs 0.03 pt/$ More than 79.2x better performance per dollar
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 16.71 pt/W vs 0.94 pt/W More than 17.8x better performance per watt
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 62 °C More than 60% higher Maximum operating temperature
Slightly higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz More than 5% higher turbo clock speed
Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 54.4 $/year 5x lower annual home energy cost
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,596 vs 1,111 Around 45% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 165.56 $/year 4.2x lower annual commercial energy cost
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Better PassMark score 6,626 vs 5,004 More than 30% better PassMark score
More threads 8 vs 6 2 more threads
Newer Sep, 2011 vs May, 2010 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD Phenom II X6 1055T

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 3 MB vs 1 MB 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.95 GHz vs 3.04 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.02 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 2760QM vs Phenom II X6 1055T

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 2760QM
2,270,000 MB/s
Phenom II X6 1055T
133,900 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 2760QM  vs
Phenom II X6 1055T 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.8 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Hexa core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
BGA 1224
AM3
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 45W 125W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 54.4 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 165.56 $/year
Performance per watt 16.71 pt/W 0.94 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W N/A

bus

Architecture DMI HyperTransport 3.0
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 4,000 MT/s

details

Core i7 2760QM  vs
Phenom II X6 1055T 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 6
L2 cache 1 MB 3 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 24 14
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 62°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.04 GHz 3.95 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 4.02 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,307.2 2,085.8
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.04 GHz 3.95 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 3000 N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,300 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR2
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Intel Core i7 2760QM
Report a correction
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus