Intel Core i7 2675QM vs i5 3210M |
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2675QM vs 3210M among laptop CPUs (over 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core i7 2675QM vs the Core i5 3210M. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core i5 3210M vs the Core i7 2675QM. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 2675QM vs i5 3210M
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i7 2675QM | vs | i5 3210M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1224 | |||
| rPGA 988B | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 45W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 16.89 pt/W | 12.39 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Core i7 2675QM | vs | i5 3210M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 22 | 25 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | HD Graphics 3000 | HD 4000 | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,200 MHz | 1,100 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Core i7 2675QM  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 3210M Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $130 | ||
| 4600M vs 3210M | ||
 | VS | |
| $130 | ||
| 4500M vs 3210M | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $130 | |
| 3230M vs 3210M | ||
 | VS | |
| $130 | ||
| 4400M vs 3210M | ||
 | VS | |
| $80 | $130 | |
| 3110M vs 3210M | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | $130 | |
| 4200U vs 3210M | ||
 | VS | |
| $130 | ||
| 5750M vs 3210M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| 5300 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
