CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2670QM vs 360 among laptop CPUs (over 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

1.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 2670QM 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 2670QM  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 2670QM

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 2670QM

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of Intel Celeron M 360

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 360

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 360 vs the Core i7 2670QM.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 2670QM vs Celeron M 360

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 2670QM  vs
Celeron M 360 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
479

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 45W 21W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 5.06 $/year
Performance per watt 14.38 pt/W 1.45 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 17.06W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i7 2670QM  vs
Celeron M 360 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 8 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 22 14

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.69 GHz 4.83 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 1.4 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,813.9 732.6
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.69 GHz 4.83 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label HD Graphics 3000 N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Core i7 2670QM
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 360
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus