Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 2620M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 2620M

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 0.8 GHz Around 3.5x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.26 MB Around 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 200 MHz 3.2x higher GPU clock speed
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.26 MB/core More than 95% more l2 cache per core
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Feb, 2011 vs Sep, 2009 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Apple APL 2298

Reasons to consider the
Apple APL 2298

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Apple APL 2298 vs the Intel Core i7 2620M.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 2620M vs APL 2298

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 2620M  vs
APL 2298 
Clock speed 2.7 GHz 0.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label HD 3000 PowerVR SGX535
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 200 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel

details

Core i7 2620M  vs
APL 2298 
Architecture x86-64 ARM
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.26 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.26 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption 28.44W N/A
Intel Core i7 2620M
Report a correction
Apple APL 2298
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus