Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Atom Z510

Intel Atom Z510

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 2610UE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 2610UE

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 1.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Significantly better performance per watt 6.55 pt/W vs 3.63 pt/W More than 80% better performance per watt
Better PassMark score 2,481 vs 194 More than 12.8x better PassMark score
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Newer Feb, 2011 vs Apr, 2008 Release date over 2 years later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom Z510

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z510

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 1.63W vs 13.81W 8.5x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 0.48 $/year vs 4.1 $/year 8.5x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 1.75 $/year vs 14.89 $/year 8.5x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 2610UE vs Atom Z510

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 2610UE  vs
Atom Z510 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
BGA 1023
441

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 2W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 0.48 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 1.75 $/year
Performance per watt 6.55 pt/W 3.63 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 1.63W

details

Core i7 2610UE  vs
Atom Z510 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 15 11

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 1.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz 1.1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 3000 N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 850 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core i7 2610UE
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z510
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus