Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 2600K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 2600K

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz More than 60% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 11,563 vs 1,932 Around 6x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 2 MB 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much better geekbench 3 single core score 3,005 vs 980 More than 3x better geekbench 3 single core score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 5.05 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better performance per watt 7.53 pt/W vs 0.57 pt/W Around 13.2x better performance per watt
Much more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l3 cache per core
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 72.6 °C vs 55 °C More than 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Apr, 2008 Release date over 2 years later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.76 GHz vs 2.1 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Opteron 2352

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2352

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 60.94W vs 114.2W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year vs 41.8 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year vs 111.78 $/year More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 2600K vs Opteron 2352

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 2600K
2,500,000 MB/s
Opteron 2352
80.8 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 2600K  vs
Opteron 2352 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1155
F
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 75W
Annual home energy cost 41.8 $/year 18.07 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 111.78 $/year 65.7 $/year
Performance per watt 7.53 pt/W 0.57 pt/W
Typical power consumption 114.2W 60.94W

details

Core i7 2600K  vs
Opteron 2352 
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 2
Clock multiplier 34 10
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.45V 1 - UnknownV
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.6°C 0 - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 5.05 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.76 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 5.05 GHz 2.1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 3000 N/A
Latest DirectX 10.x N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 850 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,350 MHz N/A
3DMark06 5,275 N/A
Intel Core i7 2600K
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2352
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus