Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i7 2600

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i7 2600

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 2600

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 2600

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Core i7 2600 vs the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO Ryzen™ 5 PRO 1500.

Front view of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO Ryzen™ 5 PRO 1500

Reasons to consider the
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO Ryzen™ 5 PRO 1500

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C vs 72.6 °C More than 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz Around 5% higher clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 2600 vs Ryzen 5 PRO Ryzen™ 5 PRO 1500

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 2600  vs
Ryzen 5 PRO Ryzen™ 5 PRO 1500 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz 3.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0

details

Core i7 2600  vs
Ryzen 5 PRO Ryzen™ 5 PRO 1500 
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 16 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 4 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 14 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.6°C Unknown - 95°C

power consumption

Typical power consumption 114.5W N/A
Intel Core i7 2600
Report a correction
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO Ryzen™ 5 PRO 1500
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus