Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 2600

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 2600

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better PassMark score 8,219 vs 2,283 More than 3.5x better PassMark score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.93 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 70% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better performance per watt 6.48 pt/W vs 1.24 pt/W Around 5.2x better performance per watt
Slightly more l3 cache 8 MB vs 6 MB Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 72.6 °C vs 55 °C More than 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Nov, 2008 Release date over 2 years later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.92 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 70% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Opteron 2376

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2376

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 60.94W vs 114.5W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year vs 41.87 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year vs 112.13 $/year More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 2600 vs Opteron 2376

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 2600  vs
Opteron 2376 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1155
F
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 75W
Annual home energy cost 41.87 $/year 18.07 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 112.13 $/year 65.7 $/year
Performance per watt 6.48 pt/W 1.24 pt/W
Typical power consumption 114.5W 60.94W

details

Core i7 2600  vs
Opteron 2376 
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 2
Clock multiplier 34 11
Voltage range 1.22 - 1.43V 1.3 - UnknownV
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.6°C 0 - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.93 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.92 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.93 GHz 2.3 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2000 N/A
Latest DirectX 10.x N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 850 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,350 MHz N/A
Intel Core i7 2600
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2376
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus