CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 760 vs 3470 among desktop CPUs (over 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 3470 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3470  based on its performance, single-core performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i5 3470

Intel Core i5 3470

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 760

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 760

Report a correction
Slightly more l3 cache 8 MB vs 6 MB Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.13 GHz vs 3.74 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher Maximum operating temperature 72.7 °C vs 67.4 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i5 3470

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3470

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 3.33 GHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly lower typical power consumption 86.05W vs 114.5W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 2,983 vs 2,089 Around 45% better geekbench 3 single core score
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Jul, 2010 Release date over 1 years later
Supports more RAM 32,768 MB vs 16,384 MB Supports 2x more RAM
Better performance per watt 4.68 pt/W vs 2.52 pt/W More than 85% better performance per watt
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 9,436 vs 6,297 Around 50% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better geekbench 2 (64-bit) score 10,031 vs 6,551 Around 55% better geekbench 2 (64-bit) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.07 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 84.62 $/year vs 115.63 $/year More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 31.22 $/year vs 39.42 $/year More than 20% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 760 vs 3470

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 760
132,200 MB/s
Core i5 3470
2,470,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 760
6,551
Core i5 3470
10,031

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R11.5 (Single Core)

Reviews Word on the street

Core i5 760  vs 3470 

10.0
6.0
It's therefore a quad-core chip based on Intel's 45nm Nehalem processor architecture.
Core i5 760

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 760  vs
3470 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.33 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1156
LGA 1155
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2500
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,100 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 32,768 MB

details

Core i5 760  vs
3470 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Transistor count 774,000,000 1,400,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 21 32
Voltage range 0.65 - 1.4V Unknown - 1.13V
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.7°C Unknown - 67.4°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 131 22
Overclock review score 0.9 0.7
Overclocked clock speed 4.13 GHz 3.74 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 4.07 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.13 GHz 3.74 GHz

power consumption

TDP 95W 77W
Annual home energy cost 39.42 $/year 31.22 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 115.63 $/year 84.62 $/year
Performance per watt 2.52 pt/W 4.68 pt/W
Idle power consumption 62W 54.4W
Peak power consumption 132W 96.6W
Typical power consumption 114.5W 86.05W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 2,500 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Core i5 760
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3470
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus