Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 760

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 760

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.26 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 2 MB 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.13 GHz vs 3.32 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark score 3,903 vs 1,727 More than 2.2x better PassMark score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.49 GHz vs 2.27 GHz Around 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Newer Jul, 2010 vs Jan, 2010 Release date 6 months later
Front view of Intel Celeron G1101

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1101

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 59.31W vs 114.5W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better performance per dollar 1.01 pt/$ vs 0.74 pt/$ More than 35% better performance per dollar
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 17.59 $/year vs 39.42 $/year 2.2x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 63.95 $/year vs 115.63 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 760 vs Celeron G1101

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Core i5 760
15,060

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 760  vs
Celeron G1101 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 2.26 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1156

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 73W
Annual home energy cost 39.42 $/year 17.59 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 115.63 $/year 63.95 $/year
Performance per watt 1.3 pt/W 0.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 114.5W 59.31W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 2,500 MT/s 2,500 MT/s

details

Core i5 760  vs
Celeron G1101 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 774,000,000 382,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.13 GHz 3.32 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.49 GHz 2.27 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.13 GHz 3.32 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 17,066.66 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 16,384 MB
Intel Core i5 760
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1101
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus