Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 760

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 760

Report a correction
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of AMD A4 3360

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 3360

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 114.5W 2.2x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 39.42 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 115.63 $/year 2x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Core i5 760  vs A4 3360 

L2 cache

A4 3360
2 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 760  vs
A4 3360 
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1156
FM1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Core i5 760  vs
A4 3360 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 95W 65W
Annual home energy cost 39.42 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 115.63 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 114.5W 52.81W
Intel Core i5 760
Report a correction
AMD A4 3360
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus