Winner
Intel Core i3 4130
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 4130 based on its .
See full details| | Intel Core i5 750 vs i3 4130 |
| | Significantly more l3 cache 8 MB | | More cores 4 |
| | Slightly more l2 cache 1 MB | | More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core |
by Legit Reviews (Sep, 2009)Benchmark Results with a GeForce GTX 295 Graphics Card: World In Conflict showed that the Intel Core i7 870 and Core i5 750 are great processors and easily blow by anything that AMD has to offer on the desktop processor market.
| | Newer manufacturing process 22 nms | | Is hyperthreaded Yes |
| | Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Core i5 750 6.3 Core i3 4130 6.5 | |
| Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Core i5 750 7.5 Core i3 4130 9.3 | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Core i5 750 7.0 Core i3 4130 6.6 | |
| Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Core i5 750 6.4 Core i3 4130 8.1 | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
| Core i5 750 6.8 Core i3 4130 7.7 | |
| | | Intel Core i3 4130CPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
| Significantly more l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 3 MB | Around 2.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Slightly more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.14 GHz | vs | 3.49 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.22 GHz | vs | 3.47 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nms | vs | 45 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.66 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 43.88W | vs | 122.45W | 2.8x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,979 | vs | 1,135 | Around 75% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 6.7 pt/$ | vs | 3.05 pt/$ | Around 2.2x better performance per dollar | |||
| Supports more RAM | 32,768 MB | vs | 16,384 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
| Significantly better performance per watt | 14.18 pt/W | vs | 3.23 pt/W | Around 4.5x better performance per watt | |||
| Marginally newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Jul, 2009 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | vs | 42.81 $/year | 3.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Better PassMark score | 4,810 | vs | 3,747 | Around 30% better PassMark score | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | vs | 122.73 $/year | 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Core i5 750 | by Legit Reviews (Sep, 2009)Results: Running Cinebench R10 in 64-bit mode showed that the Intel Core i7 870 and Core i5 750 processors were more than able to keep up with the other processors.
summary | Core i5 750 | vs | i3 4130 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD graphics 4400 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,150 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 32,768 MB | |
details | Core i5 750 | vs | i3 4130 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nms | 22 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.7°C | Unknown - 72°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.14 GHz | 3.49 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.22 GHz | 3.47 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.14 GHz | 3.49 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 54W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 42.81 $/year | 13.01 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 122.73 $/year | 47.3 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.23 pt/W | 14.18 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 122.45W | 43.88W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 0 | |
| Transfer rate | 2,500 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
| Intel Core i5 750 | Intel Core i3 4130 |
| VS | |
| $114 | $110 | |
| Intel Core i3 4130 vs AMD FX 6300 | ||
| VS | |
| $114 | $70 | |
| Intel Core i3 4130 vs G3258 | ||
| VS | |
| $114 | $120 | |
| Intel Core i3 4130 vs 4150 | ||
| VS | |
| $114 | $60 | |
| Intel Core i3 4130 vs Pentium G3220 | ||
| VS | |
| $114 | $169 | |
| Intel Core i3 4130 vs AMD A10 7850K | ||
| VS | |
| $114 | $99 | |
| Intel Core i3 4130 vs AMD A8 6600K | ||
| VS | |
| $114 | $125 | |
| Intel Core i3 4130 vs 3220 | ||
| VS | |
| $335 | $229 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 3110M vs N3530 | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | ||
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron N2830 | ||
| VS | |
| $335 | $340 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs 4790K | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | $105 | |
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
| VS | |
| $378 | ||
| AMD A10 5750M vs Intel Core i7 4700MQ | ||
| VS | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 | ||