CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750 vs 6800K

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), Cinebench R11.5, Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark and 2 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Cinebench R11.5 (1-core), Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and 1 more

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Winner
AMD A10 6800K 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A10 6800K  based on its performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A10 6800K

AMD A10 6800K

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 750

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 750

Report a correction
Slightly better 3DMark11 physics score 4,570 vs 3,880 Around 20% better 3DMark11 physics score
Front view of AMD A10 6800K

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 6800K

Report a correction
Much higher turbo clock speed 4.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Around 40% higher turbo clock speed
Much higher clock speed 4.1 GHz vs 2.66 GHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Newer manufacturing process 32 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly lower typical power consumption 81.25W vs 122.45W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,492 vs 1,135 More than 30% better PassMark (Single core) score
Marginally newer Jun, 2013 vs Jul, 2009 Release date over 3 years later
Significantly better performance per dollar 5.02 pt/$ vs 3.02 pt/$ More than 65% better performance per dollar
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.9 GHz vs 4.14 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 4,885 vs 4,320 Around 15% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Better PassMark score 4,749 vs 3,746 More than 25% better PassMark score
Better performance per watt 6.03 pt/W vs 3.2 pt/W Around 90% better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 24.09 $/year vs 42.81 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly higher Maximum Operating Temperature 74 °C vs 72.7 °C Almost the same
Lower annual commercial energy cost 87.6 $/year vs 122.73 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.92 GHz vs 4.22 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 750 vs A10 6800K

GeekBench (32-bit)

Core i5 750
5,654
A10 6800K
6,337

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Core i5 750
4,570
A10 6800K
3,880
Core i5 750 A10 6800K @ community.futuremark.com

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Core i5 750
4,320
A10 6800K
4,885
Core i5 750 A10 6800K @ notebookcheck.net

Cinebench R11.5

Results: Running Cinebench R10 in 64-bit mode showed that the Intel Core i7 870 and Core i5 750 processors were more than able to keep up with the other processors.
Core i5 750 | by Legit Reviews (Sep, 2009)

Cinebench R11.5 (Single Core)

Passmark

Core i5 750
3,746
A10 6800K
4,749
New Adobe and Microsoft application tests One of the most exciting new features in PCMark 8 is the Applications benchmark which measures system performance using popular applications from the Adobe Creative Suite and Microsoft Office.
A10 6800K | by Legit Reviews (Jun, 2013)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 750  vs
A10 6800K 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 4.1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.2 GHz 4.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked No Yes
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 8670D
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 844 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-2133
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066

details

Core i5 750  vs
A10 6800K 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.7°C Unknown - 74°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 159 7
Overclocked clock speed 4.14 GHz 4.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.22 GHz 4.92 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.14 GHz 4.9 GHz

power consumption

TDP 95W 100W
Annual home energy cost 42.81 $/year 24.09 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 122.73 $/year 87.6 $/year
Performance per watt 3.2 pt/W 6.03 pt/W
Typical power consumption 122.45W 81.25W
Intel Core i5 750
Report a correction
AMD A10 6800K
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus