Winner
AMD A10 6800K
CPUBoss recommends the AMD A10 6800K based on its performance.
See full details| | Intel Core i5 750 vs AMD A10 6800K |
| | Slightly better 3DMark11 physics score 4,570 |
by Legit Reviews (Sep, 2009)Benchmark Results with a GeForce GTX 295 Graphics Card: World In Conflict showed that the Intel Core i7 870 and Core i5 750 are great processors and easily blow by anything that AMD has to offer on the desktop processor market.
| | Much higher turbo clock speed 4.4 GHz | | Much higher clock speed 4.1 GHz |
| | Significantly more l2 cache 4 MB | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
by Legit Reviews (Jun, 2013)The game has been built on Crystal Dynamics's game engine called the "Crystal Engine" and the graphics look fantastic.
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Core i5 750 6.8 A10 6800K 7.0 | |
| 3DMark06 (CPU), Cinebench R11.5, Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark and 2 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Core i5 750 7.7 A10 6800K 8.1 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 (1-core), Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and 1 more | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Core i5 750 7.1 A10 6800K 9.4 | |
| Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Core i5 750 6.4 A10 6800K 7.3 | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
| Core i5 750 7.2 A10 6800K 7.5 | |
Winner |
| | | AMD A10 6800KCPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
| Slightly better 3DMark11 physics score | 4,570 | vs | 3,880 | Around 20% better 3DMark11 physics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much higher turbo clock speed | 4.4 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | Around 40% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much higher clock speed | 4.1 GHz | vs | 2.66 GHz | Around 55% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 32 nms | vs | 45 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 81.25W | vs | 122.45W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,492 | vs | 1,135 | More than 30% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Marginally newer | Jun, 2013 | vs | Jul, 2009 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| Significantly better performance per dollar | 5.02 pt/$ | vs | 3.02 pt/$ | More than 65% better performance per dollar | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.9 GHz | vs | 4.14 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better 3DMark06 CPU score | 4,885 | vs | 4,320 | Around 15% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 4,749 | vs | 3,746 | More than 25% better PassMark score | |||
| Better performance per watt | 6.03 pt/W | vs | 3.2 pt/W | Around 90% better performance per watt | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 24.09 $/year | vs | 42.81 $/year | Around 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Slightly higher Maximum Operating Temperature | 74 °C | vs | 72.7 °C | Almost the same | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 87.6 $/year | vs | 122.73 $/year | Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.92 GHz | vs | 4.22 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Core i5 750 | by Legit Reviews (Sep, 2009)Results: Running Cinebench R10 in 64-bit mode showed that the Intel Core i7 870 and Core i5 750 processors were more than able to keep up with the other processors.
A10 6800K | by Legit Reviews (Jun, 2013)New Adobe and Microsoft application tests One of the most exciting new features in PCMark 8 is the Applications benchmark which measures system performance using popular applications from the Adobe Creative Suite and Microsoft Office.
summary | Core i5 750 | vs | A10 6800K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 4.1 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Radeon™ HD 8670D | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 844 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-2133 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
details | Core i5 750 | vs | A10 6800K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nms | 32 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.7°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 159 | 7 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.14 GHz | 4.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.22 GHz | 4.92 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.14 GHz | 4.9 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 100W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 42.81 $/year | 24.09 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 122.73 $/year | 87.6 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.2 pt/W | 6.03 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 122.45W | 81.25W | |
| Intel Core i5 750 | AMD A10 6800K |
| VS | |
| $160 | $120 | |
| 7850K vs 6800K | ||
| VS | |
| $110 | $120 | |
| 6300 vs 6800K | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $120 | |
| 4770K vs 6800K | ||
| VS | |
| $140 | $120 | |
| 7700K vs 6800K | ||
| VS | |
| $226 | $120 | |
| 3570K vs 6800K | ||
| VS | |
| $170 | $120 | |
| 8350 vs 6800K | ||
| VS | |
| $99 | $120 | |
| 6600K vs 6800K | ||
| VS | |
| $253 | $325 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| VS | |
| $97 | $281 | |
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
| VS | |
| $161 | $225 | |
| N3530 vs 3110M | ||
| VS | |
| $340 | $325 | |
| 4790K vs 4770K | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | ||
| N2830 vs 3217U | ||
| VS | |
| $378 | ||
| 4700MQ vs 5750M | ||
| VS | |
| 800 vs 5 Octa | ||