0 Comments
| | Intel Core i5 660 vs AMD FX 6300 |
Released January, 2010
Intel Core i5 660
- 3.33 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 660
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 72.6 °C |
| | Lower typical power consumption 59.31W | | More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core |
VS
Released October, 2012
AMD FX 6300
- 3.5 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the AMD FX 6300
| | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 4.1 GHz | | Much more l2 cache 6 MB |
| | Is unlocked Yes | | Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz |
by Tech Radar (Dec, 2012)The benchmarks show that almost across the board this chip is faster than the higher clocked six-core CPU.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| | | AMD FX 6300CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 72.6 °C | vs | 62.5 °C | More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 59.31W | vs | 77.19W | Around 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.33 MB/core | More than 50% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 17.59 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | Around 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 63.95 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 4.1 GHz | vs | 3.6 GHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache | 6 MB | vs | 1 MB | 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 3.33 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
| More l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 4 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More cores | 6 | vs | 2 | Three times as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2012 | vs | Jan, 2010 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| Significantly better performance per dollar | 8.99 pt/$ | vs | 3.85 pt/$ | More than 2.2x better performance per dollar | |||
| More threads | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more threads | |||
| Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 7,871 | vs | 4,943 | Around 60% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| Better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 2,290,000 MB/s | vs | 1,640,000 MB/s | Around 40% better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
| Better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 7,447 | vs | 4,925 | More than 50% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.81 GHz | vs | 3.33 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 660 vs FX 6300
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 660
4,943
FX 6300
7,871
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 660
2,268
FX 6300
2,053
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 660
1,640,000 MB/s
FX 6300
2,290,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 660
4,925
FX 6300
7,447
GeekBench
Core i5 660
5,664
FX 6300
9,503
3D Mark 11 (Physics)
Core i5 660
3,280
FX 6300
6,080
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i5 660
3,263
FX 6300
6,444
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i5 660
1,379
FX 6300
1,446
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 660 | vs | FX 6300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.1 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Hexa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1156 | |||
| AM3+ | |||
| Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 1.1 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| ABM | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| CLMUL | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| CVT16 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| TBM | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 73W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 17.59 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 63.95 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 9.33 pt/W | 9.93 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 59.31W | 77.19W | |
details | Core i5 660 | vs | FX 6300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 6 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 6 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.33 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
| Transistor count | 382,000,000 | 1,200,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 25 | 20 | |
| Voltage range | 0.65 - 1.4V | 0.8 - 1.43V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.6°C | Unknown - 62.5°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.63 GHz | 4.77 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.33 GHz | 4.81 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.63 GHz | 4.77 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 733 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1866 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 29,866.66 MB/s | |
| Intel Core i5 660 | AMD FX 6300 |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
| VS | |
| 113 € | 95 € | |
| Intel Core i3 6100 vs AMD FX 6300 | ||
| VS | |
| 166 € | 95 € | |
| Intel Core i5 3570K vs AMD FX 6300 | ||
| VS | |
| 172 € | 95 € | |
| Intel Core i5 4460 vs AMD FX 6300 | ||
| VS | |
| 68 € | 95 € | |
| AMD Athlon X4 860K vs FX 6300 | ||
| VS | |
| 109 € | 95 € | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs 6300 | ||
| VS | |
| 72 € | 95 € | |
| AMD FX 4300 vs 6300 | ||
| VS | |
| $117 | 95 € | |
| Intel Core i3 4170 vs AMD FX 6300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| VS | |
| 317 € | 289 € | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
| VS | |
| 317 € | 222 € | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | $281 | |
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs 5200U | ||
| VS | |
| $378 | $378 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700HQ vs 4720HQ | ||
| VS | |
| 317 € | 353 € | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 5820K | ||
| VS | |
| 222 € | 217 € | |
| Intel Core i5 6600K vs 4690K | ||





