0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 6500 vs 6400T |
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i5 6500
- 3.2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 6500
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 65 | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz |
![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz | ![]() | Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 13,537 |
VS
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i5 6400T
- 2.2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the 6400T
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W | ![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year |
![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 65 | vs | 52.8 | Around 25% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 45% higher clock speed | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | Around 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 13,537 | vs | 4,389 | More than 3x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 5,880 MB/s | vs | 853 MB/s | Around 7x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Better turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | vs | 950 MHz | More than 10% better turbo clock speed | |||
Better performance per watt | 3.9 pt/W | vs | 2.9 pt/W | Around 35% better performance per watt | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 71 °C | vs | 66 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| |||||||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 52.81W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 6500 vs 6400T
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 6500
13,537
Core i5 6400T
4,389
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 6500
4,233
Core i5 6400T
2,393
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 6500
5,880 MB/s
Core i5 6400T
853 MB/s
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Core i5 6500
65
Core i5 6400T
52.8
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 6500 | vs | 6400T |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB | 65,536 MB |
details | Core i5 6500 | vs | 6400T |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 71°C | Unknown - 66°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | 950 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.9 pt/W | 2.9 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s |
Intel Core i5 6500 ![]() | Intel Core i5 6400T ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $401 | |
6600 vs 6500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$187 | $401 | |
6400 vs 6500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$190 | $401 | |
4460 vs 6500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $401 | |
4590 vs 6500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $401 | |
3770 vs 6500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $401 | |
6100 vs 6500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $401 | |
6600K vs 6500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||