Intel Core i5 6400 vs 4460 |
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i5 6400
- 2.7 GHz
- Quad core
8.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 6400
 | Much better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score 1.16 fps | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
| | Lower typical power consumption 52.81W | | Newer Jul, 2015 |
VS
Released May, 2014
Intel Core i5 4460
- 3.2 GHz
- Quad core
8 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the 4460
| | Much better performance per dollar 4.17 pt/$ | | Higher clock speed 3.2 GHz |
| | Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 9,739 | | Much better performance per watt 9.42 pt/W |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6400 vs 4460 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score | 1.16 fps | vs | -1 fps | Around 225% better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 68.25W | Around 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | May, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | Around 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much better performance per dollar | 4.17 pt/$ | vs | 0.93 pt/$ | Around 4.5x better performance per dollar | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 9,739 | vs | 3,989.5 | Around 2.5x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 9.42 pt/W | vs | 2.67 pt/W | More than 3.5x better performance per watt | |||
| Significantly better turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 950 MHz | More than 15% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 6400 vs 4460
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 6400 | vs | 4460 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
details | Core i5 6400 | vs | 4460 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 71°C | Unknown - 72.72°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 950 MHz | 1,100 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 84W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.67 pt/W | 9.42 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 68.25W | |
 Intel Core i5 6400  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 4460 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $190 | $200 | |
| 4460 vs 4590 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $190 | $160 | |
| 4460 vs 4570 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $190 | $240 | |
| 4460 vs 3770 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $190 | ||
| 4460 vs 7600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $190 | $100 | |
| 4460 vs 6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $190 | $125 | |
| 4460 vs 6100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $187 | $125 | |
| 6400 vs 6100 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 9 comments.
