0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 6300HQ vs 4210H |
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i5 6300HQ
- 2.3 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 6300HQ
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 57.3 | ![]() | Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 17.34 mPixels/s |
![]() | More l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
VS
Released July, 2014
Intel Core i5 4210H
- 2.9 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 4210H
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 3.82 pt/$ | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.9 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per watt 18.27 pt/W | ![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 57.3 | vs | 49.3 | More than 15% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 17.34 mPixels/s | vs | 10.68 mPixels/s | More than 60% better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | |||
More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More l3 cache | 6 MB | vs | 3 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Better PassMark score | 6,037 | vs | 4,522 | Around 35% better PassMark score | |||
Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date a year later | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much better performance per dollar | 3.82 pt/$ | vs | 0.63 pt/$ | More than 6x better performance per dollar | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.9 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
Much better performance per watt | 18.27 pt/W | vs | 3.47 pt/W | More than 5.2x better performance per watt | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Significantly better turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | vs | 950 MHz | More than 20% better turbo clock speed | |||
Higher GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | Around 15% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,880 | vs | 1,675 | More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 6300HQ vs 4210H
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Core i5 6300HQ
23.46 mHash/s
Core i5 4210H
4.24 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Core i5 6300HQ
17.34 mPixels/s
Core i5 4210H
10.68 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Core i5 6300HQ
1.14 fps
Core i5 4210H
0.55 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 6300HQ
3,205
Core i5 4210H
6,304
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 6300HQ
1,957
Core i5 4210H
2,981
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 6300HQ
145.7 MB/s
Core i5 4210H
3,390,000 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i5 6300HQ
6,037
Core i5 4210H
4,522
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i5 6300HQ
1,675
Core i5 4210H
1,880
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 6300HQ | vs | 4210H |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 45W | 47W | |
Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 11.32 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 41.17 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.47 pt/W | 18.27 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 38.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Core i5 6300HQ | vs | 4210H |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 3 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.43 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.2 GHz | 3.43 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 400 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 950 MHz | 1,150 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Core i5 6300HQ ![]() | Intel Core i5 4210H ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$378 | $250 | |
6700HQ vs 6300HQ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$393 | $250 | |
6500U vs 6300HQ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$378 | $250 | |
4720HQ vs 6300HQ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $250 | |
6200U vs 6300HQ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | ||
7200U vs 6300HQ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$378 | $225 | |
4710HQ vs 4210H | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$378 | $225 | |
4720HQ vs 4210H | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
Sondre Lian (08:59 AM, January 18, 2017)