Intel Core i5 6300HQ vs 4210H |
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i5 6300HQ
- 2.3 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 6300HQ
 | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 57.3 | | Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 17.34 mPixels/s |
| | More l2 cache 1 MB | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
VS
Released July, 2014
Intel Core i5 4210H
- 2.9 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 4210H
| | Much better performance per dollar 3.82 pt/$ | | Higher clock speed 2.9 GHz |
| | Much better performance per watt 18.27 pt/W | | Higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 57.3 | vs | 49.3 | More than 15% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 17.34 mPixels/s | vs | 10.68 mPixels/s | More than 60% better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | |||
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More l3 cache | 6 MB | vs | 3 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Better PassMark score | 6,037 | vs | 4,522 | Around 35% better PassMark score | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date a year later | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much better performance per dollar | 3.82 pt/$ | vs | 0.63 pt/$ | More than 6x better performance per dollar | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.9 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 18.27 pt/W | vs | 3.47 pt/W | More than 5.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly better turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | vs | 950 MHz | More than 20% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | Around 15% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,880 | vs | 1,675 | More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 6300HQ vs 4210H
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 6300HQ | vs | 4210H |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 45W | 47W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 11.32 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 41.17 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.47 pt/W | 18.27 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 38.19W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Core i5 6300HQ | vs | 4210H |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.43 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.2 GHz | 3.43 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 400 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 950 MHz | 1,150 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Core i5 6300HQ  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 4210H Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $378 | $250 | |
| 6700HQ vs 6300HQ | ||
 | VS | |
| $393 | $250 | |
| 6500U vs 6300HQ | ||
 | VS | |
| $378 | $250 | |
| 4720HQ vs 6300HQ | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | $250 | |
| 6200U vs 6300HQ | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | ||
| 7200U vs 6300HQ | ||
 | VS |  |
| $378 | $225 | |
| 4710HQ vs 4210H | ||
| | VS | |
| $378 | $225 | |
| 4720HQ vs 4210H | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
