0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 6300HQ vs 7500U |
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i5 6300HQ
- 2.3 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 6300HQ
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 57.3 | ![]() | More l2 cache 1 MB |
![]() | Slightly more l3 cache 6 MB | ![]() | More cores 4 |
VS
Released July, 2016
Intel 7500U
- 2.7 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 7500U
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.7 GHz | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 13.61 pt/W |
![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 12.19W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 57.3 | vs | 52.9 | Around 10% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Slightly more l3 cache | 6 MB | vs | 4 MB | 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Higher GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | vs | 300 MHz | More than 15% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2.7 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much better performance per watt | 13.61 pt/W | vs | 3.47 pt/W | Around 4x better performance per watt | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 12.19W | vs | 36.56W | 3x lower typical power consumption | |||
Better turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | vs | 950 MHz | More than 10% better turbo clock speed | |||
Better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score | 1.33 fps | vs | 1.14 fps | More than 15% better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,939 | vs | 1,675 | More than 15% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.46 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | vs | 10.84 $/year | 3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | vs | 39.42 $/year | 3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Newer | Jul, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2015 | Release date a year later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 6300HQ vs 7500U
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Core i5 6300HQ
23.46 mHash/s
7500U
30.22 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Core i5 6300HQ
17.34 mPixels/s
7500U
24.44 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Core i5 6300HQ
1.14 fps
7500U
1.33 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 6300HQ
3,205
7500U
7,626
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 6300HQ
1,957
7500U
3,570
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 6300HQ
145.7 MB/s
7500U
4,480 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i5 6300HQ
6,037
7500U
5,239
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i5 6300HQ
1,675
7500U
1,939
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 6300HQ | vs | 7500U |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 45W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.47 pt/W | 13.61 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 4,000 MT/s |
details | Core i5 6300HQ | vs | 7500U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.46 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.2 GHz | 3.46 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | Intel® HD Graphics 620 | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 950 MHz | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Core i5 6300HQ ![]() | Intel 7500U ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $378 | |
6300HQ vs 6700HQ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $393 | |
6300HQ vs 6500U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $378 | |
6300HQ vs 4720HQ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $281 | |
6300HQ vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$378 | ||
7500U vs 6700HQ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
7500U vs 7200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$393 | ||
7500U vs 6500U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||