0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 6287U vs 5200U |
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i5 6287U
- 3.1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 6287U
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.1 GHz | ![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz |
![]() | Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz | ![]() | Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score 21.11 fps |
VS
Released January, 2015
Intel Core i5 5200U
- 2.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 5200U
![]() | Much better performance per watt 42.03 pt/W | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 2.24 pt/$ |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 12.19W | ![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 40% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | Around 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Significantly better turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 20% better turbo clock speed | |||
Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score | 21.11 fps | vs | 11.22 fps | Around 90% better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.61 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Jan, 2015 | Release date 6 months later | |||
| |||||||
Much better performance per watt | 42.03 pt/W | vs | 11.82 pt/W | More than 3.5x better performance per watt | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 2.24 pt/$ | vs | 1.09 pt/$ | More than 2x better performance per dollar | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 12.19W | vs | 22.75W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | vs | 6.75 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | vs | 24.53 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 6287U vs 5200U
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Core i5 6287U
62.04 mHash/s
Core i5 5200U
19.78 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Core i5 6287U
39.13 mPixels/s
Core i5 5200U
14.84 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
Core i5 6287U
415.06 fps
Core i5 5200U
126.29 fps
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Core i5 6287U
-1 fps
Core i5 5200U
0.71 fps
CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench
Core i5 6287U
21.11 fps
Core i5 5200U
11.22 fps
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 6287U | vs | 5200U |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 28W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 6.75 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 24.53 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 11.82 pt/W | 42.03 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 22.75W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 4,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Core i5 6287U | vs | 5200U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 3 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.61 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.5 GHz | 2.61 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® Iris™ Graphics 550 | Intel® HD Graphics 5500 | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 900 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 16,384 MB |
Intel Core i5 6287U ![]() | Intel Core i5 5200U ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
5200U vs 7410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
5200U vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $393 | |
5200U vs 5500U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $161 | |
5200U vs N3700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
5200U vs 4210U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $275 | |
5200U vs 5005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $393 | |
5200U vs 4510U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||