Winner
Intel Core i5 6267U
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 6267U based on its performance, single-core performance and value.
See full details Intel Core i5 6267U vs 6200U |
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i5 6267U
- 2.9 GHz
- Dual core
9.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 6267U
 | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 50.1 | | Higher clock speed 2.9 GHz |
| | Higher turbo clock speed 3.3 GHz | | Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score 20.72 fps |
VS
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i5 6200U
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
8.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the 6200U
| | Lower typical power consumption 12.19W | | Lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year |
| | Lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6267U vs 6200U among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 9.2 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 50.1 | vs | 44.9 | More than 10% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 2.9 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | Around 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score | 20.72 fps | vs | 9.11 fps | More than 2.2x better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 1.01 pt/$ | vs | 0.57 pt/$ | Around 80% better performance per dollar | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Better turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,780 | vs | 1,500 | Around 20% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Slightly better PassMark score | 5,017 | vs | 3,984 | More than 25% better PassMark score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Lower typical power consumption | 12.19W | vs | 22.75W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | vs | 6.75 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | vs | 24.53 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 6267U vs 6200U
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 6267U | vs | 6200U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 28W | 15W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 6.75 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 24.53 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 10.93 pt/W | 10.6 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 22.75W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 4,000 MT/s | 4,000 MT/s | |
details | Core i5 6267U | vs | 6200U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® Iris™ Graphics 550 | Intel® HD Graphics 520 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Core i5 6267U  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 6200U Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9420 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A10-9600P vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | $281 | |
| 5200U vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $393 | $281 | |
| 6500U vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7200U vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 6th Gen A10-8700P vs 6200U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
| | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
