Intel Core i5 6200U vs 5200U

older Released July, 2015

Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 6200U

	Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 44.9		Much better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 26.65 mHash/s
	Better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz		Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,551

older Released January, 2015

Reasons to buy the 5200U

Much better performance per watt

42.03 pt/W

Much better performance per dollar

2.24 pt/$

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
Core i5 6200U 5.4 Core i5 5200U 5.4 A8 7410 5.2
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
Core i5 6200U 8.0 Core i5 5200U 8.4 A8 7410 5.6
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

	Integrated Graphics
	Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Core i5 6200U n.d. Core i5 5200U n.d. A8 7410 n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

	Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)
	Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Core i5 6200U 6.0 Core i5 5200U 6.2 A8 7410 5.7
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

	Performance per Watt
	How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Core i5 6200U 6.5 Core i5 5200U 6.6 A8 7410 6.3
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

	Value
	Are you paying a premium for performance?
Core i5 6200U n.d. Core i5 5200U n.d. A8 7410 n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.6	CPUBoss Score
	Combination of all six facets
Core i5 6200U 8.4 Core i5 5200U 8.6 A8 7410 7.6

Winner
Intel Core i5 5200U

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 5200U based on its value.

See full details

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 6200U

Report a correction

Much better 3DMark06 CPU score

44.9

41.6

Around 10% better 3DMark06 CPU score

Much better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score

26.65 mHash/s

19.78 mHash/s

Around 35% better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score

Better turbo clock speed

1,000 MHz

900 MHz

More than 10% better turbo clock speed

Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score

5,551

5,017

More than 10% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score

Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air)

2.8 GHz

2.61 GHz

More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Better overclocked clock speed (Water)

2.8 GHz

2.2 GHz

More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Newer

Jul, 2015

Jan, 2015

Release date 6 months later

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 5200U

Report a correction

Much better performance per watt

42.03 pt/W

10.6 pt/W

Around 4x better performance per watt

Much better performance per dollar

2.24 pt/$

0.57 pt/$

Around 4x better performance per dollar

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 6200U

26.65 mHash/s

Core i5 5200U

19.78 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core i5 6200U

-1 mPixels/s

Core i5 5200U

14.84 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 6200U

1.17 fps

Core i5 5200U

0.71 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 6200U

5,551

Core i5 5200U

5,017

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 6200U

2,583

Core i5 5200U

2,474

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 6200U

3,610 MB/s

Core i5 5200U

3,380,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i5 6200U

3,984

Core i5 5200U

3,502

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i5 6200U

1,500

Core i5 5200U

1,414

summary	Core i5 6200U	5200U
Clock speed	2.3 GHz	2.2 GHz
Turbo clock speed	2.8 GHz	2.7 GHz
Cores	Dual core	Dual core
Is unlocked	No	No
features
Has a NX bit	Yes	Yes
Has virtualization support	Yes	Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes	Yes
power consumption
TDP	15W	15W
Annual home energy cost	3.61 $/year	3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost	13.14 $/year	13.14 $/year
Performance per watt	10.6 pt/W	42.03 pt/W
Typical power consumption	12.19W	12.19W
bus
Architecture	FSB	DMI 2.0
Number of links	1	1
Transfer rate	4,000 MT/s	5,000 MT/s

details	Core i5 6200U	5200U
Architecture	x86-64	x86-64
Threads	4	4
L2 cache	0.5 MB	0.5 MB
L2 cache per core	0.25 MB/core	0.25 MB/core
L3 cache	3 MB	3 MB
L3 cache per core	1.5 MB/core	1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process	14 nm	14 nm
Max CPUs	1	1
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed	2.8 GHz	2.61 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	2.8 GHz	2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	2.8 GHz	2.61 GHz
integrated graphics
GPU	GPU	GPU
Label	Intel® HD Graphics 520	Intel® HD Graphics 5500
Number of displays supported	3	3
GPU clock speed	300 MHz	300 MHz
Turbo clock speed	1,000 MHz	900 MHz
memory controller
Memory controller	Built-in	Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1600
DDR3
Channels	Dual Channel	Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth	25,600 MB/s	25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size	32,768 MB	16,384 MB

Intel Core i5 6200U

Report a correction

Intel Core i5 5200U

Report a correction

Compare

Popular Comparisons

Comments

Showing 9 comments.

Curar Con Abejas (08:32 PM, March 5, 2017)

why? there are 16gb modules

Jo jo (01:15 PM, March 4, 2017)

I agree with mr Rahul , it depends on how many slots do you have ? I have a labtop with just 2 slots of ram and core i5 6200u ,CPU accepts 32 gb but the MB doesnot ! , ( but what if there is a 16 gb one piece ram ? , will it be able to install 32 gb with 2 slots ??

Rahul (04:48 AM, September 22, 2016)

This benchmark is not significant. You should actually check the passmark score on cpubenchmark.net.

Rahul (04:45 AM, September 22, 2016)

It's not like that your motherboard should have enough slots to install the ram. If your motherboard have only two slots then you can only install 16 GB RAM. No more than that.

Nicollo (11:25 AM, July 17, 2016)

why is that a fail? and I'm not familiar with this scores either, so what's the meaning of that geekbench score? does it mean that 5200U 1000x better than 6200U (seriously asking)

Devraj (10:33 AM, July 2, 2016)

In the above comparison 6200U supports Maximum memory size 32,768 MB does the Mean Supported RAM? if yes then can I conclude with this that RAM support is based on Processor not based on Mather Board? Appreciate experts advise Regards

Yuki Core (07:02 PM, June 8, 2016)

Sometimes improvements apply only to some areas, mostly in terms of the actual performance, rather than benchmarks. That's if the improvements are made in collaboration with driver updates. But honestly, something is not right with the tests done here. You should expect the small improvement of 6200u, but certainly nothing significant. Graphics chip is the biggest improvement here.

taster (08:26 PM, May 21, 2016)

Um.. The AES rating is an epic fail too

Sukhoi (10:20 PM, May 18, 2016)

the tests for the 6200u need to be redone on a machine as optimized for it as the 5200U was tested on. There's no way the 6200 has lower performance when it is universally described as 0-10% improvement per clock

	VS
		$281
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U

	VS
		$281
7th Gen A10-9600P vs 6200U

	VS
		$281
7th Gen A9-9420 vs 6200U

	VS
$393		$281
6500U vs 6200U

	VS
		$281
7410 vs 5200U

	VS
$393		$281
5500U vs 5200U

	VS
$161		$281
N3700 vs 5200U

	VS
$300		$305
2500 vs W3520

	VS
$350		$272
6700K vs 4790K

	VS
		$281
6410 vs 4200U

	VS
		$281
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U

	VS
$161		$275
N3540 vs 4005U

	VS
$225		$134
3217U vs 847

	VS
$350		$250
6700K vs 6600K

Intel Core i5 6200U vs 5200U