Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 6200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 6200U

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 10.6 pt/W vs 5.02 pt/W More than 2x better performance per watt
Lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 30.06W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Oct, 2013 Release date over 1 years later
Lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 8.91 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 32.41 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 4330M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4330M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 55.2 vs 44.9 Around 25% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 25% higher turbo clock speed
Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better turbo clock speed 1,250 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 25% better turbo clock speed
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Higher GPU clock speed 400 MHz vs 300 MHz Around 35% higher GPU clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,843 vs 1,500 Around 25% better PassMark (Single core) score
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better performance per dollar 0.68 pt/$ vs 0.57 pt/$ Around 20% better performance per dollar

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 6200U vs 4330M

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 6200U  vs
4330M 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2.8 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 37W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 8.91 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 32.41 $/year
Performance per watt 10.6 pt/W 5.02 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 30.06W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 4,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i5 6200U  vs
4330M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.8 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz 2.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 520 Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 300 MHz 400 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 1,250 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Core i5 6200U
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 4330M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus