Intel Core i5 6200U vs 430M |
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i5 6200U
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 6200U
 | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Much better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz |
| | Higher turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz | | Much better performance per watt 10.6 pt/W |
VS
Released January, 2010
Intel Core i5 430M
- 2.26 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 430M
| | More l2 cache 1 MB | | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 500 MHz |
| | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i5 6200UCPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 766 MHz | More than 30% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.53 GHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 10.6 pt/W | vs | 3.22 pt/W | More than 3.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 5,551 | vs | 3,268 | Around 70% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 12.19W | vs | 28.44W | 2.3x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,500 | vs | 898 | More than 65% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Jan, 2010 | Release date over 5 years later | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.59 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 0.57 pt/$ | vs | 0.5 pt/$ | Around 15% better performance per dollar | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | 2.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | vs | 30.66 $/year | 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.27 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 500 MHz | vs | 300 MHz | More than 65% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 6200U vs 430M
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 6200U | vs | 430M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.26 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.53 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 15W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 10.6 pt/W | 3.22 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 12.19W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 4,000 MT/s | 2,500 MT/s | |
details | Core i5 6200U | vs | 430M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.59 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | 2.27 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.8 GHz | 2.59 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 520 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 300 MHz | 500 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 766 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 17,066.66 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 8,192 MB | |
 Intel Core i5 6200U  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 430M Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9420 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A10 7th Gen A10-9600P vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | $281 | |
| Intel Core i5 5200U vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $393 | $281 | |
| Intel Core i7 6500U vs i5 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A6 7th Gen A6-9220 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| Intel 7200U vs Core i5 6200U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
| | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
