0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs 430M |
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i5 6200U
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 6200U
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | Much better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz |
![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 10.6 pt/W |
VS
Released January, 2010
Intel Core i5 430M
- 2.26 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 430M
![]() | More l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 500 MHz |
![]() | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 766 MHz | More than 30% better turbo clock speed | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.53 GHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better performance per watt | 10.6 pt/W | vs | 3.22 pt/W | More than 3.2x better performance per watt | |||
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 5,551 | vs | 3,268 | Around 70% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 12.19W | vs | 28.44W | 2.3x lower typical power consumption | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,500 | vs | 898 | More than 65% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Jan, 2010 | Release date over 5 years later | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.59 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better performance per dollar | 0.57 pt/$ | vs | 0.5 pt/$ | Around 15% better performance per dollar | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | 2.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | vs | 30.66 $/year | 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.27 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 500 MHz | vs | 300 MHz | More than 65% higher GPU clock speed | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 6200U vs 430M
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 6200U
5,551
Core i5 430M
3,268
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 6200U
2,583
Core i5 430M
1,508
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 6200U
3,610 MB/s
Core i5 430M
106,000 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i5 6200U
3,984
Core i5 430M
2,105
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i5 6200U
1,500
Core i5 430M
898
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 6200U | vs | 430M |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.26 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.53 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 15W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 10.6 pt/W | 3.22 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 12.19W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 4,000 MT/s | 2,500 MT/s |
details | Core i5 6200U | vs | 430M |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.59 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | 2.27 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.8 GHz | 2.59 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 520 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 300 MHz | 500 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 766 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 17,066.66 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 8,192 MB |
Intel Core i5 6200U ![]() | Intel Core i5 430M ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A10 7th Gen A10-9600P vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9420 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
Intel Core i5 5200U vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$393 | $281 | |
Intel Core i7 6500U vs i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel 7200U vs Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A10 6th Gen A10-8700P vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||