Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 6200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 6200U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 667 MHz Around 50% better turbo clock speed
Much better performance per watt 10.6 pt/W vs 2.8 pt/W More than 3.8x better performance per watt
Slightly higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 2.13 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,551 vs 2,832 More than 95% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,500 vs 753 Around 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 28.44W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Jan, 2010 Release date over 5 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz vs 2.34 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core i3 330M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 330M

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 500 MHz vs 300 MHz More than 65% higher GPU clock speed
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 6200U vs i3 330M

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 6200U
3,610 MB/s
Core i3 330M
89,200 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 6200U  vs
i3 330M 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2.13 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 35W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 10.6 pt/W 2.8 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 28.44W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 4,000 MT/s 2,500 MT/s

details

Core i5 6200U  vs
i3 330M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.8 GHz 2.34 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz 2.34 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 520 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 300 MHz 500 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 667 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1066
DDR3-800
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 17,066.66 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 8,192 MB
Intel Core i5 6200U
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 330M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus