Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 6200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 6200U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.73 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 25.19W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz vs 1.73 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz vs 1.73 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 7.47 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 27.16 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core Solo T1250

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core Solo T1250

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Core i5 6200U  vs Solo T1250 

clock speed

Core i5 6200U
2.3 GHz
Core Solo T1250
1.73 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Core i5 6200U
2.8 GHz
Core Solo T1250
1.73 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Core i5 6200U
2.8 GHz
Core Solo T1250
1.73 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 6200U  vs
Solo T1250 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 1.73 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 31W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 7.47 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 27.16 $/year
Typical power consumption 12.19W 25.19W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i5 6200U  vs
Solo T1250 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.8 GHz 1.73 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 1.73 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz 1.73 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 520 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 300 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Core i5 6200U
Report a correction
Intel Core Solo T1250
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus