CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6200U vs M3-6Y30 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
Core i5 6200U
5.5
Core M3-6Y30
5.4
7200U
5.5
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
Core i5 6200U
6.7
Core M3-6Y30
6.4
7200U
6.7
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Core i5 6200U
n.d.
Core M3-6Y30
n.d.
7200U
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Core i5 6200U
6.8
Core M3-6Y30
7.0
7200U
7.2
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Core i5 6200U
5.8
Core M3-6Y30
7.6
7200U
5.8
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
Core i5 6200U
n.d.
Core M3-6Y30
n.d.
7200U
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more
8.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets
Core i5 6200U
8.3
Core M3-6Y30
8.9
7200U
8.4

Winner
Intel Core M3-6Y30 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core M3-6Y30  based on its power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 6200U

Front view of Intel Core i5 6200U
Front view of Intel Core M3-6Y30

Intel Core M3-6Y30

CPUBoss Winner
Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 6200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 6200U

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 0.9 GHz More than 2.5x higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 25% higher turbo clock speed
Better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 850 MHz Around 20% better turbo clock speed
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 44.9 vs 35.6 More than 25% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score 8.81 fps vs 6.36 fps Around 40% better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz vs 2.02 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz vs 0.9 GHz More than 3x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core M3-6Y30

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core M3-6Y30

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 31.02 pt/W vs 10.63 pt/W Around 3x better performance per watt
More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 6200U vs M3-6Y30

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 6200U
28.93 mHash/s
Core M3-6Y30
22.23 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core i5 6200U
-1 mPixels/s
Core M3-6Y30
16.22 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i5 6200U
1.17 fps
Core M3-6Y30
1.24 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 6200U
5,551
Core M3-6Y30
4,647.5

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 6200U
2,583
Core M3-6Y30
2,388.5

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 6200U
3,610 MB/s
Core M3-6Y30
3,015 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i5 6200U
3,984
Core M3-6Y30
3,056

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i5 6200U
1,500
Core M3-6Y30
1,183

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Core i5 6200U  vs
M3-6Y30 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 0.9 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 15W 4.5W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 1.08 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 3.94 $/year
Performance per watt 10.63 pt/W 31.02 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 3.66W

bus
Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 4,000 MT/s 4,000 MT/s

details

 Core i5 6200U  vs
M3-6Y30 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 4 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.8 GHz 2.02 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 0.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz 2.02 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 520 Intel® HD Graphics 515
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 300 MHz 300 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 850 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 16,384 MB
Intel Core i5 6200U
Report a correction
Intel Core M3-6Y30
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
Leon Parvu (11:10 PM, September 15, 2017)
yes because the 6200u is 15w tdp and 6y30 is 4.5w, makes sense?
Dan (11:22 AM, May 30, 2017)
Even though the performance per hour is better for the m3, all reviews and unboxings claim that the battery lasts less than on an i5. The device I was following was the Microsoft Surface Pro 4 and the m3 reached 6 hours, while the i5 reached 9.
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss