Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 6200U

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 6200U

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 6200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 6200U

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 90% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 500 MHz 2x better turbo clock speed
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,551 vs 1,336 Around 4.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Much better performance per watt 10.6 pt/W vs 2 pt/W More than 5.2x better performance per watt
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,500 vs 474 Around 3.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher GPU clock speed 300 MHz vs 166 MHz More than 80% higher GPU clock speed
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Significantly better performance per dollar 0.57 pt/$ vs 0.27 pt/$ More than 2x better performance per dollar
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 4 years later
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron U3600

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron U3600

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 6200U vs Celeron U3600

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 6200U
3,610 MB/s
Celeron U3600
50.3 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 6200U  vs
Celeron U3600 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 18W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 10.6 pt/W 2 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 14.63W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 4,000 MT/s 2,500 MT/s

details

Core i5 6200U  vs
Celeron U3600 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.8 GHz 1.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 1.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz 1.2 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 520 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 300 MHz 166 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 500 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-800
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 8,192 MB
Intel Core i5 6200U
Report a correction
Intel Celeron U3600
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus