Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 6200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 6200U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 0.9 GHz More than 2.5x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of Intel Celeron M 333

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 333

Report a correction
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 5.69W vs 12.19W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 1.69 $/year vs 3.61 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 6.13 $/year vs 13.14 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Core i5 6200U  vs Celeron M 333 

clock speed

Core i5 6200U
2.3 GHz
Celeron M 333
0.9 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 6200U  vs
Celeron M 333 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 0.9 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 15W 7W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 1.69 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 6.13 $/year
Typical power consumption 12.19W 5.69W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i5 6200U  vs
Celeron M 333 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 520 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 300 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Core i5 6200U
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 333
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus