Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i5 6200U

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i5 6200U

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 6200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 6200U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 59.31W 4.9x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 10.6 pt/W vs 0.97 pt/W Around 11x better performance per watt
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Jan, 2010 Release date over 5 years later
Better PassMark score 3,984 vs 1,727 More than 2.2x better PassMark score
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 17.59 $/year 4.9x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 63.95 $/year 4.9x lower annual commercial energy cost
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz vs 2.27 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron G1101

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1101

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better performance per dollar 1.01 pt/$ vs 0.57 pt/$ Around 80% better performance per dollar
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.32 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 6200U vs Celeron G1101

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 6200U  vs
Celeron G1101 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2.26 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 73W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 17.59 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 63.95 $/year
Performance per watt 10.6 pt/W 0.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 59.31W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 4,000 MT/s 2,500 MT/s

details

Core i5 6200U  vs
Celeron G1101 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.8 GHz 3.32 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 2.27 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz 3.32 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 520 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 300 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1066
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 17,066.66 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 16,384 MB
Intel Core i5 6200U
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1101
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus