CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6200U vs C2518 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Atom C2518
n.d.
7100U
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Atom C2518 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Atom C2518  based on its power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 6200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 6200U

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 3 single core score 2,583 vs 769 More than 3.2x better geekbench 3 single core score
Much better performance per watt 10.6 pt/W vs 3.24 pt/W More than 3.2x better performance per watt
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,551 vs 2,369 More than 2.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Jul, 2013 Release date over 2 years later
Better performance per dollar 0.57 pt/$ vs 0.46 pt/$ More than 20% better performance per dollar
Front view of Intel Atom C2518

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2518

Report a correction
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 6200U vs Atom C2518

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i5 6200U
3,610 MB/s
Atom C2518
289.5 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 6200U  vs
Atom C2518 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 32,768 MB

details

Core i5 6200U  vs
Atom C2518 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 520 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 300 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 15W 13W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 3.13 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 11.39 $/year
Performance per watt 10.6 pt/W 3.24 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 10.56W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core i5 6200U
Report a correction
Intel Atom C2518
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus