Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i5 6200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 6200U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Front view of AMD Athlon II X3 2.6 GHz

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X3 2.6 GHz

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.67 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core Around 2.8x more l2 cache per core
More cores 3 vs 2 1 more cores; run more applications at once

Features Key features of the Core i5 6200U  vs Athlon II X3 2.6 GHz 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i5 6200U  vs
Athlon II X3 2.6 GHz 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Tri core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Core i5 6200U  vs
Athlon II X3 2.6 GHz 
Threads 4 3
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.67 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 12.19W N/A
Intel Core i5 6200U
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II X3 2.6 GHz
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus