0 Comments
| Intel Core i5 560UM vs Solo U1300 |
Released September, 2010
Intel Core i5 560UM
- 1.33 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 560UM
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core Solo U1300 vs the Core i5 560UM. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i5 560UM vs Solo U1300
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i5 560UM
2,383
Core Solo U1300
867
GeekBench
Core i5 560UM
3,071
Core Solo U1300
867
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i5 560UM | vs | Solo U1300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.06 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
BGA 1288 | |||
479 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 18W | 6W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | 1.45 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.49 pt/W | 4.19 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 14.63W | 4.88W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Core i5 560UM | vs | Solo U1300 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
Threads | 4 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 382,000,000 | 151,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 8 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.07 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.33 GHz | 1.07 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.33 GHz | 1.07 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 166 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 500 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Supports ECC | No | No |
Intel Core i5 560UM ![]() | Intel Core Solo U1300 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $250 | |
N2840 vs 560UM | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$37 | $250 | |
x7-Z8700 vs 560UM | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | ||
620UM vs 560UM | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $250 | |
3317U vs 560UM | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $250 | |
330UM vs 560UM | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$60 | $250 | |
560M vs 560UM | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | ||
N270 vs U1300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||